Continuous Threat Modeling

Continuous Application
Threat Modeling Service

Threat Modeling Under Two Hours with Fork for Real-Time Risk Visibility and Attack Simulation

  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /
  • /

Frequently Asked Questions

Fork helps organizations move threat modeling beyond static diagrams, workshops, and security checklists. It creates an evolving view of application risk by connecting application context, business impact, threat intelligence, vulnerability findings, security controls, and realistic attack scenarios. This helps security and development teams determine which threats are relevant, which weaknesses are most likely to be exploited, and which remediation activities should receive priority.
Fork is designed for organizations that need to operationalize threat modeling across application security, product security, DevSecOps, engineering, risk, and business teams. It is particularly useful for organizations that develop or maintain business-critical applications, operate in regulated or high-risk industries, need to scale threat modeling across multiple applications, want to connect threat models with security testing and vulnerability data, need clearer communication between technical teams and business stakeholders, and want to prioritize remediation according to business impact and residual risk.
IriusRisk and ThreatModeler provide enterprise threat modeling platforms focused on automation, architecture analysis, secure design workflows, threat libraries, integrations, and organization-wide threat modeling. Fork takes a different approach by implementing the risk-centric PASTA threat modeling methodology and connecting technical threats directly to application context, business impact, attack viability, and residual risk. Key differentiators include a practical implementation of the seven-stage PASTA methodology, integrated business impact analysis, risk prioritization across business, product, and security impact, a proprietary residual risk formula with configurable quality gates, evidence-based mapping across CWE, CVE, EPSS, CAPEC, MITRE ATT&CK, MITRE D3FEND, and OWASP ASVS, the ability to connect identified threats with targeted adversarial testing, optional access to VerSprite security experts for exploitability analysis, and support for both application-level and component-level threat modeling.
Fork can be evaluated as an alternative to IriusRisk or ThreatModeler, but the best choice depends on the organization’s threat modeling objectives. Organizations primarily seeking automated architecture modeling, extensive component libraries, or broad infrastructure visualization may evaluate those platforms alongside Fork. Organizations seeking PASTA-based threat modeling, business-aligned risk analysis, residual risk measurement, and a direct connection between threat modeling and adversarial security testing may find Fork better aligned with their requirements.
Fork evaluates risk using application context, threat relevance, vulnerability data, attack likelihood, existing countermeasures, business impact, and residual exposure. Instead of treating every vulnerability or theoretical threat equally, Fork helps teams focus on the scenarios most likely to create meaningful harm to the organization, its customers, its operations, or its regulated data.
Yes. Fork can connect threat model findings with targeted adversarial testing. Through Fork Enterprise PT, organizations can request testing of specific weaknesses, vulnerabilities, attack paths, and threat scenarios directly from the threat model. VerSprite security experts can then evaluate whether the modeled threat is practically exploitable and provide evidence to support remediation decisions, allowing teams to validate risk rather than relying exclusively on theoretical likelihood scores.
Fork is designed to integrate with application security and development workflows, including data from SAST, DAST, software composition analysis, vulnerability management, penetration testing, threat intelligence, and issue-tracking platforms. These integrations help keep threat models aligned with changes in the application and its security posture while reducing the need to manually recreate findings across multiple systems. Available integrations should be confirmed during the evaluation process based on your current technology stack and workflow requirements.
Fork is designed to help teams develop a risk-centric threat model in under two hours when the necessary application and business context is available. The exact time depends on application complexity, architecture maturity, available documentation, integrations, and the depth of analysis required. Models can then be refined continuously as the application, attack surface, and threat landscape evolve.
Yes. Fork Enterprise supports unlimited applications and threat models, organizational units, multiple team members, granular permissions, SSO, audit logs, and edit history. This allows organizations to manage threat modeling at the application, portfolio, business unit, or enterprise level while maintaining appropriate access controls and governance.
Yes. Fork is designed to support collaboration between security, development, product, architecture, risk, and business teams. Security teams can establish the methodology, quality gates, threat libraries, and governance requirements, while developers and product teams contribute application context, architectural changes, components, and remediation updates — distributing threat modeling across the software development lifecycle without requiring every participant to become a dedicated threat modeling specialist.
Fork can help organizations document threats, weaknesses, controls, countermeasures, residual risk, decisions, and historical changes. Its mappings to recognized security frameworks and taxonomies can support secure development, risk management, audit preparation, and compliance activities. However, Fork should be used as part of a broader compliance program and does not independently guarantee compliance with any regulation or standard.
Yes. Fork Community allows organizations to create a threat model for one application with a single user at no cost. Organizations that need multiple applications, additional users, integrations, access controls, SSO, audit history, or managed adversarial testing can evaluate Fork Enterprise or Fork Enterprise PT.
Fork Enterprise PT combines the Fork Enterprise platform with access to targeted security testing and exploitability analysis. This option is intended for organizations that want security experts to validate whether modeled threats, vulnerabilities, and attack paths can be exploited in practice, providing a direct connection between threat modeling, offensive security testing, evidence collection, and remediation prioritization.
A productive Fork evaluation typically includes a representative application or service, architecture diagrams or technical documentation, the application’s business purpose and key users, data classifications and regulatory requirements, existing SAST, DAST, SCA, vulnerability, or penetration testing results, current security controls and countermeasures, business impact criteria, and the teams that will participate in threat modeling and remediation. This information allows the evaluation to demonstrate how Fork connects technical findings with real application and business risk.
Fork may be a strong fit when your organization needs to align threat modeling with measurable business risk, operationalize the PASTA methodology, maintain threat models throughout the application lifecycle, integrate vulnerability and threat intelligence data, measure residual risk after controls are applied, validate modeled threats through adversarial testing, and give security, development, product, and business teams a shared view of application risk. The most effective evaluation is to build a threat model for a representative application and compare the resulting risks, attack scenarios, remediation priorities, and workflow against your current process.
ci cd security, devsecops ci/cd, web app pen testing

We’re Not a Vendor
We’re Your Security Partner

  • Risk-centric security
  • True extension of your team
  • Executive-level experience